Business Forums @ Company Leap Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2012, 01:19:20 PM
Home Help Search Login Register
News: Welcome to the Company Leap Business Forums!

+  Company Leap Board
|-+  General
| |-+  General Lounge and Chat
| | |-+  What are the chances of...
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: What are the chances of...  (Read 783 times)
altyfc

Posts: 147



View Profile
« on: January 21, 2004, 10:54:33 PM »

Not even Law and Order would attempt to capture this mess...This is an
unbelievable twist of fate!!!

At the 1994 annual awards dinner given for Forensic Science, AAFS
President Dr. Don Harper Mills astounded his audience with the legal
complications of a bizarre death. Here is the story:

On March 23, 1994 the medical examiner viewed the body of Ronald Opus and
concluded that he died from a shotgun wound to the head. Mr. Opus had
jumped from the top of a ten-storey building intending to commit suicide.

He left a note to the effect indicating his despondency. As he fell past
the ninth floor his life was interrupted by a shotgun blast passing
through a window, which killed him instantly.

Neither the shooter nor the deceased was aware that a safety net had been
installed just below the eighth floor level to protect some building
workers and that Ronald Opus would not have been able to complete his
suicide the way he had planned.

"Ordinarily," Dr Mills continued, "Someone who sets out to commit suicide
and ultimately succeeds, even though the mechanism might not be what he
intended, is still defined as committing suicide." That Mr. Opus was shot
on the way to certain death, but probably would not have been successful
because of the safety net, caused the medical examiner to feel that he had
a homicide on his hands.

The room on the ninth floor, where the shotgun blast emanated, was
occupied by an elderly man and his wife. They were arguing vigorously and
he was threatening her with a shotgun. The man was so upset that when he
pulled the trigger he completely missed his wife and the pellets went
through the window striking Mr. Opus.

When one intends to kill subject "A" but kills subject "B" in the attempt,
one is guilty of the murder of subject "B."

When confronted with the murder charge the old man and his wife were both
adamant and both said that they thought the shotgun was not loaded.

The old man said it was a long-standing habit to threaten his wife with
the unloaded shotgun. He had no intention to murder her. Therefore the
killing of Mr. Opus appeared to be an accident; that is, assuming the gun
had been accidentally loaded.

The continuing investigation turned up a witness who saw the old couple's
son loading the shotgun about six weeks prior to the fatal accident.

It transpired that the old lady had cut off her son's financial support
and the son, knowing the propensity of his father to use the shotgun
threateningly, loaded the gun with the expectation that his father would
shoot his mother.

Since the loader of the gun was aware of this, he was guilty of the murder
even though he didn't actually pull the trigger. The case now becomes one
of murder on the part of the son for the death of Ronald Opus.

Now comes the exquisite twist.

Further investigation revealed that the son was, in fact, Ronald Opus. He
had become increasingly despondent over the failure of his attempt to
engineer his mother's murder. This led him to jump off the ten-storey
building on March 23rd, only to be killed by a shotgun blast passing
through the ninth story window. The son had actually murdered himself so
the medical examiner closed the case as a suicide.

(A true story from Associated Press, Reported by Kurt Westervelt)

Aaron
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Also see:
Marketing forums | Ecommerce forums


Office | Phones | Cameras | More | Business

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1 RC2 | SMF © 2001-2005, Lewis Media Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!